|
First of all you must decide to acquire those
characteristics of diligence, persistence, and tie breaking skills for yourself. Once the
newcomer to competitions accepts that nothing in the way of big prizes are likely to come
without effort, then the very first hurdle is overcome. The next step is to take out a subscription to the enthusiasts' fortnightly
magazine 'Competitors Journal', in which you will discover mountains of information of use
to seasoned competitors and raw newcomers alike: what competitions are currently
available; what tie breaker trends are currently winning favour with the judges; how to
improve your skills in first part tasks and tie breaker writing too; what tips, techniques
and ideas can improve your winning chances, and so much more.
You might next decide to subscribe to a solutionist
magazine, offering a service usually only in respect of preliminary competition tasks. For
a fee that varies widely between firms, the agency employs a team of specialist
researchers to investigate the answer to part one factual questions, provide expert advice
in relation to order-of-merit tasks, to search through those elusive word-squares, to do
crosswords, spot-the-ball, and whatever else might be required by which to be almost
certain that you will find your way through the first stage of the competition and
ultimately ensure yourself a place on the final judging table where those tie breaker
sills come to the fore.
Whether using a solutionist service might be seen as an
unnecessary extravagance or else something conferring an unfair advantage on those who can
afford to avail themselves on the service in the first place, is largely for the
individual to decide. Certainly using such an agency will save you an awful lot of time
and trouble looking up answers and carrying out other tasks for yourself, though it must
be remembered that though a good solutionist's research is accurate of 90% of occasions,
what of that odd 1 competition in 10, for which you have written a brilliant tie breaker
but in using the erroneous information provided you effectively disqualify yourself before
you submit your entry to the post?
For my own part, I subscribe to a solutionist service, but
view their research information only as a back up to that research I carry out for myself.
If our answers agree - great - I now go to town on my tie breaker. If our answers differ,
I recheck my own findings. If we still differ, I enter those answers I personally believe
to be correct.
That competitor intend on maintaining a constant stream of
wins has several other tricks up his or her sleeve, including:
a) Keeping records of past winning tie breakers,
particularly those of competitions sponsored by the firm whose competition is now being
entered. The aim here is not to copy or plagiarise past winning lines, just to discover
whether any trends exist which might be capitalised upon. In my own experience, I won a
great many competitions promoted by supermarket chain 'Presto' - every single one of them
with a rhyming couplet!.
b) Maintaining a competitions diary with details of closing
dates, qualifiers required, research to carry out, and so on carefully entered.
c) Maintaining a wordbank system along with records of
one's own winning and non-winning tie breakers. The latter of course being one's own
creation, leave the creator free to use them in any future competition for which they
might prove appropriate. A wordbank simply comprises some method of filing ideas, words,
skeleton outlines, along with such as proverbs, double meaning words and phrases, homonyms
and catch phrases, all of which might prove useful and potentially invaluable as a
starting point for some future competition slogan or tie breaker.
d) Remember: Strategy is All Important. |
|